|
Bagheera: In the Wild
VANISHING IN THE WILD
The current
endangered species and extinction crisis is unique, in that the loss of
biodiversity is occurring very rapidly, and the causes of the crisis are the
activities of a single species: human beings. Some scientists believe the
current crisis began when humans and their domestic animals first began to
colonize the various parts of the globe.
Others believe
it began around 1600, when human population growth exploded, and the level of
per capita resource consumption began to rise dramatically in some parts of the
world.
The Extinction Crisis
Note:
Emphasized words can be
found in the
Glossary.
The human
species, one of millions of life forms on this planet, is threatening the very
existence of many other species. Biological diversity, or
biodiversity, is the variety
of life forms that interact to support and sustain the balance of nature.
As the human
population grows, more and more of the Earth's living space, food, and other
resources are consumed. Explosive
human population growth and consumption
are causing loss of biological diversity at an ever-increasing pace, an
extinction crisis that threatens to surpass the mass
extinctions that have occurred periodically during
the Earth's history.
Never before
have so many species been threatened with
extinction in so short a
period of time. In fact, some scientists estimate that species are disappearing
at the rate of one every day, hundreds of times faster than the background rate
of extinction.
(See discussion of
extinction rates
in "IN THE WILD:
Extinct".)
What else is
different about this mass extinction, in addition to how fast it is happening?
Scientists believe that other extinction events were caused by phenomena such as
climate change and collisions of
asteroids or meteors with the Earth. After these events, new species evolved
that were adapted to the changed conditions. In contrast, modern extinctions are
being caused by human use of the Earth's resources.
If humans
continue to destroy, degrade, and fragment the
habitat that for millions of
years has supported other life forms, it will be difficult for new species to
evolve. Only species that are adapted to human-altered landscapes will be able
to survive or evolve.
Why It Matters

Should it
matter to humans that other life forms are disappearing? Many people think so.
Human populations depend on plants and animals for much of their food,
medicines, clothing, and shelter.
Perhaps even
more important, intact ecosystems
perform many vital functions, like purifying the air, filtering harmful
substances out of water, turning decayed matter into nutrients, preventing
erosion and flooding, and moderating climate. It is not known how many species
can be eliminated from an ecosystem without its functioning being impaired.
It is likely
that an ecosystem with more species is more stable than one that has lost some
species. For example, research has shown that grassland plots with a greater
number of plant species are better able to withstand drought than those with
less species diversity. This stability may well be important in the future, as
changes in precipitation brought on by
global warming stress ecosystems.
Some species
are particularly important to the health of their ecosystems. These are called
"keystone species", because like the
center stone in an arch, their removal can greatly affect the entire system. A
classic example of the consequences of removing a keystone species occurred when
fur hunters eliminated sea otters from some Pacific kelp beds. Otters eat sea
urchins, which eat kelp. With its major predator gone, urchin populations
exploded and consumed most of the kelp. Fish and other animals associated with
kelp beds disappeared.
In many
cultures, humans value animals for reasons other than maintaining ecosystem
health. Animals play a prominent role in the religions or belief systems of many
cultures. Many people value other species for the enjoyment they give. Still
others believe humans have a moral obligation to live in harmony with other life
forms. Whatever their reasons, most people agree that it is important to try to
prevent species extinction. Not all people agree on how to do this, however, or
what to do when human needs conflict with needs of other species.
It is only
recently that people have begun to be concerned about the decline of wildlife
that has no commercial value to humans. Wildlife laws originally were passed to
control exploitation of animals
that people hunted. For example, international regulation of whaling started
after hunting had depleted many whale populations.
Whalers were
worried that soon no more whales would be left and their livelihood would
disappear. In the United States,
the first wildlife laws regulated hunting of game animals to preserve
populations large enough for people to continue hunting.
Now, our
concern has expanded to include animals that have little or no obvious economic
value, like songbirds, as well as those we value for food or other uses.
Threatened and Endangered Species
Under the
Endangered Species Act
in the United
States, a species
or subspecies is
regarded as "endangered" when it is in danger of extinction throughout all or a
significant part of its normal range. A species is considered "threatened" when
it is likely to become an endangered species in the foreseeable future.
A species does
not have to be in danger of global extinction in order to be regarded as
endangered. For example, many species that are endangered or threatened in the
lower 48 states of the United States still thrive in Alaska, which is largely
still wilderness. These include the grizzly bear, bald eagle, and gray wolf,
among others.
It makes sense
to protect a species before it has declined too far. When its
populations have become
small or isolated, it is harder and more expensive to help the species recover.
In addition, many plants and animals play an important role in their
ecosystems, such as that of
a
keystone species. It is important to conserve species in
many parts of their range so ecosystems remain healthy.
Habitat Loss
The most common
cause of endangerment is habitat
loss. Plants and animals need space to live and energy provided by food, just as
humans do.
As human
population and consumption increase, wildlife habitat is converted to houses and
highways. Forests are cut down for building materials, fuel, and paper. Prairies
and forest land are turned into crop land and grazing land for our livestock,
and shopping malls stand where
wetlands once existed. The damming of rivers to create
hydropower has flooded river valleys, making it hard for ocean-going fish to
migrate.
Even if habitat
is not completely destroyed, it can be
fragmented or degraded so
much that it can no longer support the species it once did.
Many species,
particularly large mammals, need large areas of habitat to survive and
reproduce. Patches of forest or grassland surrounded by farms or cities, or
divided by roads, will not support these species. (For more discussion of the
effects of fragmentation, see
Island Biogeography).
A significant
percentage of many habitats in North America that are important for wildlife
have been destroyed or degraded since the time of European colonization. Over 50
percent of wetlands are gone, 90 percent of ancient forest in the Northwest has
been logged, and millions of acres of grasslands have disappeared.
OVEREXPLOITATION
Humans also
deplete wildlife populations by capturing or killing individuals for their own
use. Animals are killed for food, fur, feathers, oil, medicines, crafts, and a
host of other uses. They are also shot to stop them from killing livestock, or
simply for sport.
Animal eggs are
taken for food, and species are captured for pets or to use in medical
experiments. Sophisticated technology allows ever-increasing numbers of animals
to be captured *at once, depleting seemingly limitless species like ocean fish.
As the
developing nations of the world accumulate more wealth, the demand for animal
products grows. The international market for animals and animal parts is a huge
and growing cause of wildlife endangerment.
Introduced Species
Humans often
move species around, introducing species that are not native to an
ecosystem and disrupting the
delicate balance that evolved among species in that ecosystem. Species can be
moved both accidentally and intentionally. The
introduced species may
compete with native species for food or nest sites, or they may prey on native
species.
As humans
penetrate into more remote places, we allow other species to do the same by
using the roads we build. In addition, we transport species by sea. Ships take
on water in one location for ballast, travel across the ocean, and then dump the
ballast water, carrying new aquatic life forms to habitats already occupied by
other species.
We travel from
island to island for trade or recreation, taking foreign species with us.
Islands are particularly vulnerable because they are isolated and native species
have nowhere to go when other species move in.
Pollution
One of the ways
habitat is degraded is by pollution. Creatures that depend on either freshwater
or saltwater for all or part of their life cycles, like fish, frogs, marine
mammals, and many invertebrates,
are especially vulnerable to pollution.
Water is
polluted by things like run-off of fertilizers and pesticides from farms, oil
and other chemicals from roads, and human sewage that flows untreated into
rivers, lakes, and oceans. In addition to polluting waterways, we divert fresh
water from rivers and lakes for irrigation, drinking water, and industrial uses.
There is less water left in the rivers and lakes to dilute the polluting
chemicals.
Ships pollute
saltwater by dumping waste. Oil spills, like the big spill from the oil tanker
Exxon Valdez in Alaska
in 1989, kill large numbers of animals. Many smaller spills and leaks go
relatively undetected, but their cumulative effects over the years also can
injure wildlife.
Water is not
the only element that suffers from pollution. Factories and cars release
chemicals into the air. The chemicals are deposited on land by rain, causing
pollution, including what is known as
acid rain. Acid rain weakens
and kills plant life, decreasing the food supply for animals that eat the
plants.
Pesticides are
another source of pollution. Farmers use pesticides to keep insects from eating
crops. Pesticides remain in crops and in wild plants eaten by herbivores (plant
eaters). Insects also carry pesticides. Animals that eat herbivores (like
predatory birds) and insects (like birds and amphibians) get high concentrations
of these chemicals in their systems. The chemicals can disrupt physical
functions like reproduction in these animals.
Other Factors
We know less
about other factors that probably contribute to the decline of
biological diversity. We
know little about how changes in our atmosphere, such as
global warming or
ozone depletion, is
affecting other life forms.
Disease and
insect infestations, which are natural and nonthreatening phenomena in many
ecosystems, can deal a death blow to populations weakened or depleted by other
pressures.
We know very
little about how all these factors interact to affect plant and animal
populations. We do know, however, that these "natural" changes are becoming
proportionately less significant as human impacts increase in magnitude,
intensity, and duration
Conservation Biology: A
Response to the Extinction Crisis
The new
discipline of conservation biology has developed to respond to the increased
threats to biological diversity.
Its main goals are to determine human impacts on other species and to develop
practical solutions to reduce the extinction rate.
Conservation
biologists draw on knowledge from a broad range of fields. They apply the
natural and social sciences, law, economics, ethics, resource management,
veterinary medicine, and many other kinds of knowledge to individual
conservation challenges.
Scientists,
political leaders, resource managers, economists, lawyers, educators,
anthropologists, engineers, and many others cooperate to solve these difficult
problems. Solutions often require compromises between conservation and
short-term human needs.
Conservation
biology is called a "crisis discipline" because decisions must be made under
severe time pressures, often with incomplete information. We can not afford to
wait to take action until we have all the information we would like.
Conservation Actions
There are many
ways conservation biologists are addressing the extinction crisis. These
include:
- Establishing protected areas where wildlife habitat is
preserved or restored;
- Developing new ways to farm, log, and graze livestock,
that preserve habitat values;
- Educating citizens about the importance of conserving
wildlife and things they can do to help wildlife and the environment in
general;
- Encouraging changes in production and consumption that
foster resource conservation and reduce waste and pollution, through legal
or economic incentives;
- Enacting and enforcing laws and international treaties
that regulate exploitation of wildlife and wildlife trade;
- Establishing captive breeding programs for species
whose populations have been so depleted that they need human help to
increase their numbers and genetic diversity;
- Providing alternatives to local people who are
dependent on wildlife and forests for food and fuel;
- Encouraging family planning to reduce human population
growth.
Questions for Thought
1.
Society does not have the resources to save every species from
human-caused extinction. How should we decide where to put our energy and
resources in conserving species? Should we concentrate on the species people
like best, the "charismatic megafauna?" What other criteria might we use?
2.
Should our primary aim be to preserve a maximum amount of biodiversity?
Or, in light of what we know about ecosystem interactions, should we concentrate
on ecosystems and try to maintain ecological processes?
3.
In a few decades, your children or other young people may ask you what
you did in the 1990's, when the full extent of the biodiversity crisis became
known. What will your answer be?
Earth losing 3 species an hour, UN says
Faster, more determined response to unprecedented extinction rate is urgent,
secretary-general says
Alister Doyle, Reuters
Wednesday, May 23, 2007 Vancouver Sun
OSLO -- Human activities are wiping out three animal or plant species every hour
and the world must do more to slow the worst spate of extinctions since the
dinosaurs by 2010, the United Nations said Tuesday.
Scientists and environmentalists issued reports about threats to creatures and
plants including right whales, Iberian lynxes, wild potatoes and peanuts on May
22, the International Day for Biological Diversity.
"Biodiversity is being lost at an unprecedented rate," UN Secretary-General Ban
Ki-moon said in a statement. Global warming is adding to threats such as land
clearance, pollution and rising human populations.
"The global response to these challenges needs to move much more rapidly, and
with more determination at all levels," he said.
Many experts reckon the world will fail to meet the goal set by world leaders at
an Earth Summit in 2002 of a "significant reduction" by 2010 in the rate of
species losses.
"We are indeed experiencing the greatest wave of extinctions since the
disappearance of the dinosaurs," said Ahmed Djoghlaf, head of the UN Convention
on Biological Diversity. Dinosaurs vanished 65 million years ago.
"Extinction rates are rising by a factor of up to 1,000 above natural rates.
Every hour, three species disappear. Every day, up to 150 species are lost.
Every year, between 18,000 and 55,000 species become extinct," he said.
"The cause: human activities."
A "Red List" of endangered species, however, lists only 784 species driven to
extinction since 1500.
Craig Hilton-Taylor, manager of the list compiled by the World Conservation
Union grouping 83 governments as well as scientists and environmental
organizations, said the hugely varying figures might both be right, in their
way. "The UN figures are based on loss of habitats, estimates of how many
species lived there and so will have been lost," he told Reuters. "Ours are more
empirical -- those species we knew were there but cannot find."
UN climate experts say global warming, blamed mainly on human use of fossil
fuels, will wreck habitats by drying out the Amazon rainforest, for instance, or
by melting polar ice.
The World Conservation Union also said that one in every six land mammals in
Europe was under threat of extinction, including the Iberian lynx, Arctic fox
and the Mediterranean monk seal.
Another report by farm researchers said that global warming may drive wild
varieties of plants such as potatoes and peanuts to extinction by mid-century,
wiping out traits that might help modern crops resist pests or disease.
The WWF conservation group and the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society said
that whales, dolphins and porpoises were "facing increasing threats from climate
change" because of factors such as rising sea temperatures.
A survey in Britain said climate change might actually help some of the nation's
rare wildlife and plants, such as the greater horseshoe bat and the turtle dove,
to spread to new areas.
Amphibians disappear from Costa Rica jungles
Global warming allows fatal skin fungus to invade habitat, biologist says
Wednesday, May 23, 2007 Vancouver Sun
SAN JOSE, Costa Rica -- Global warming is the top suspect for the disappearance
of 17 amphibian species from Costa Rican jungles, scientists said on Tuesday,
warning monkey and reptile populations were also plummeting.
Five of the amphibian species were found only in Costa Rica, meaning their
disappearance from the country's jungles spells extinction, said Alvaro Herrero,
a biologist with Costa Rica's National Biodiversity Institute.
Among the now-extinct species is the golden toad, named for its shimmering
yellow colour, and two varieties of Harlequin frog, identified by their black
and green stripes.
Scientists have yet to identify a precise mechanism for the disappearance of the
amphibians, which began decades ago, but a prime suspect is a fatal fungus that
has invaded their habitats, Herrero said.
"It is believed climate change is raising temperatures allowing a skin fungus to
enter the places where the amphibians resided," he said.
Several studies in recent years have linked the rapid disappearance of many of
the world's frog and toad species to global warming.
About a third of the 5,743 known species of frogs, toads and other amphibians
are classified as threatened, according to the Global Amphibian Assessment
survey.
In La Selva, a biological station in northern Costa Rica run by Duke
University's Organization of Tropical Studies, scientists have found a
75-per-cent decline in amphibian population over the last 35 years.
####
Read more:
WWF - Living Planet Report 2018
WWF
Living Planet Report
– Massive decline in
the size of populations
The key highlight is
the rapid decline of the surveyed wildlife populations and the underlying cause
is us …
Exploding human
consumption is the driving force behind the unprecedented planetary change we
are witnessing, through the increased demand for energy, land and water.
While climate change is
a growing threat, the main drivers of biodiversity decline continue to be the
overexploitation of species, agriculture and land conversion.
Animal Agriculture & Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria, PTSD, Biodiversity Loss,
& World Hunger
(Dec.18/18
cleantechnica.com)
IUCN
https://www.iucnredlist.org/en
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
Established in 1964, the International Union for Conservation of
Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species has evolved to become the world’s most
comprehensive information source on the global extinction risk status of animal,
fungus and plant species.
2022:
More than
41,000
species
are threatened with extinction. That is still 28% of all assessed
species.
Be sure to visit all our
pages for news, info, and & action!
|